What the mHealth fight is all about.
Posted by Ron Otten on 05/06/2009
Medical applications for the iPhone are far over 300 apps. Does this mean a knockout for competitors? A pack of medical applications was just released for Android.
Although our phones are far from tricorders at this point (but getting closer), Android has a bit more of a versatile position. A powerful smartphone OS and a passable netbook or tablet one. It seems like it may be a really good fit for embedded systems. With a modern, touchable, and inexpensive OS like Android, there could be a huge increase in standardization and interoperability.
Obviously it wouldn’t just be doctors carrying around G1s and stuff. But picture a hospital where the embedded and use-limited devices integral to its functioning are all running Android in some form or another. It acquits itself equally well to a tablet as to a wall monitor as to a handset. A few tweaks would make it eminently networkable. Of course, this is all pie in the sky, and one could say the same for any number of alternate OSes. Still, it’s food for thought.
As for the medical applications; they are expensive! But they’re established, professional apps that also work on Blackberries and such.
This entry was posted on 05/06/2009 at 13:11 and is filed under communicating, controling, data. Tagged: Android, Health care, hospital, IT, medical centre, Operating system. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=f5ca83ca-9d6a-41c5-a728-d8703401e522)